NLT
		   logo and link to NLT home pageTalk To Your Baby logo and link
Developing language for life

Archive

A consultative prospectus for the development year


Background

Following consultation during 2001 and 2002, the National Literacy Trust has concluded that a ten-year, generative national campaign to promote the importance of early language - from birth to three - is one of the most significant contributions we can make to sustained long-term improvements in literacy competence and enhanced life chances.

The purpose of the early language campaign will be to ensure that by the end of this period:

  • all children will be receiving a stimulating language-rich start to their lives
  • the necessary foundations will have been established to ensure a self-sustaining transformation of our national culture.
During this development year, the National Literacy Trust will research and consult on the best methods for delivering such a national campaign. We shall also communicate to parents, and those who can positively influence parental beliefs and behaviours, the importance of effective home practices and the need for such a concerted national campaign.

Rationale

There is a growing body of evidence linking the development of early language and the subsequent successful acquisition of reading and writing skills.

We need to motivate and support parents to provide the good home practices that will give their children stimulating language environments. In order to do this, our society requires a systematic, orchestrated enabling of a wide range of contributors. 

Supporting research

Perhaps the most significant recent confirmations that early spoken language is the foundation for later reading and writing skills have come from the Effective Provision of Pre-school Education (EPPE) research. This has highlighted the importance, by the age of three, of the home learning environment, and that children significantly benefit from very simple home practices, regardless of the educational background of their parents and the level of home income.

"Ours is the first study in Britain to show that more important than the mother's educational qualifications is what the mother does with the child. Education matters. but if the mother reads to the child, plays rhyming games, sings songs, talks about letters and sounds, and takes the child to the library, these behaviours at home are more important."
Professor Kathy Sylva, evidence to the House of Commons Select Committee on Education and Employment, First Report, 2000.

The work of Professor Catherine Snow at Harvard also suggests a link between the home language experiences of low socio-economic children and their subsequent literacy skills development.

"If reading success is so dependent on oral language skills, should we not be placing more emphasis on vocabulary and rich language environments in the home, pre-school and the primary grades, rather than assuming that word reading skills alone will suffice?" 
Catherine Snow, The Centrality of Language: a longitudinal study of language and literacy development in low-income children, Institute of Education, University of London, 2001. 

However, there is unfortunately much anecdotal evidence to suggest that children are now less well supported than we would wish. A recent survey by the National Literacy Trust, in collaboration with the National Association of Head Teachers, suggested that heads of nurseries and schools admitting three-year-olds are concerned about a significant decline, in the last five years, in children's language competence at entry. 

The reasons for this apparent decline are complex and should not be attributed to uncaring parents. However, lack of early language stimulation can lead to language delay, and sometimes literacy and learning difficulties that then extend well beyond early literacy development and can be extremely costly or difficult to remedy.

Full research references

Bruner, J. S. (1983) Child's Talk: Learning to Use Language, Oxford: OUP.

Locke, A., Ginsborg, J. et al. (2002) Development and Disadvantage: implications for the early years and beyond. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders.

Snow, C.E. (2001) The Centrality of Language: a longitudinal study of language and literacy development in low-income children, Institute of Education, University of London.

Sticht, T. G. and James, J. H. (1984) Listening and Reading. Handbook of Reading Research. P. D. Pearson. New York and London: Longman.

Sylva, K.,  Melhuish, E., Sammons, P. and Siraj- Blatchford, I. (2000) The Effective Provision of Pre-School Education (EPPE) Project. Briefing prepared for The House of Commons Education Committee Enquiry into Early Years Education.

Wells, G and Robinson, W. (1982) The role of adult speech in language development, in C. Fraser and K. Scherer, eds., The Social Psychology of Language, Cambridge: CUP.

Ward, S. (2000) Baby Talk, Century.

Building a more supportive national culture

We have concluded that it is necessary to initiate a campaign to build a more supportive national culture which will work to strengthen parenting practices. Institutional early years initiatives, although necessary, are by themselves insufficient for dealing with the issues described above. The basis of the campaign is the need to strengthen home rather than institutional practices. After all, nearly four-fifths of children up to their third birthday are not connected with any sort of service delivery in the mainstream. 

"Sure Start is terrific but it only helps a small percentage of children in the UK. If parents could have the appropriate level of support - no matter what their background was, their economic status or where they lived - it would change the landscape of education."
Rosie Roberts OBE, former National Director, Peers Early Education Partnership

We intend to establish a radically new approach to this issue through a sustained programme of activity that harnesses the skills, energy and commitment of virtually all sectors of society and which, in particular, recognises the power of persistent and persuasive communications campaigns via the media and in a wide range of community settings.

The National Literacy Trust is well positioned to lead such a project. We are experienced at developing cross-sectoral policies and in campaigning (National Year of Reading/National Reading Campaign) and have developed an understanding of cross-community partnerships - developing systemic approaches to deep-seated educational issues. We believe this unique combination of perspective and experience enables us to lead an important initiative that could transform the life chances of thousands of our most disadvantaged children and their parents. A successful campaign could make a huge impact on thousands of children's lives and save society millions of pounds spent on language support, educational remediation, and other symptomatic responses.

If, over the ten-year period of the campaign, we prevented 50,000 children from needing additional language support or literacy prevention, at a cost on average of £750 per child, we would save society over £37 million. We estimate that the cost of the ten-year campaign will be £2 million - a "national saving" of over £35 million.

What we will do in the proposed campaign

The work of the Trust will be to unlock and then integrate involvements from early years professionals, parenting organisations and many other community and education sectors, which will be linked to the expertise of leading professional communicators. In this way we aim to influence, systematically, those home/parenting cultures that lack confidence or awareness of linguistic development practices. It will be a mix of systemic planning for social change, integrated with the harnessing of planned communications.

Central to the campaign's approach will be the involvement and support of a very wide range of highly committed partners

In the development year,  we shall:

  • extend the work of the national pilot group
  • secure the commitment to the campaign of key agencies and individuals, including the engagement on a pro-bono basis of leading marketing and PR expertise
  • promote the importance of empowered parents via speaking commitments and national and regional media articles and broadcasts
  • audit and map existing good practices
  • establish a promotional and networking website
  • hold ten regional consultative and networking meetings 
  • establish a group of active campaign champions across the key sectors
  • establish the "brand image" for the campaign
  • establish the national advisory group
  • prepare the campaign's business plan
  • secure funding for the first three years of the campaign
  • establish the base-line for evaluating the success of the campaign
  • create, via the above, the reinforcing momentum for the campaign. 


Click here for information on what the proposed campaign will entail. 

Donate Online

Bookshop




 

The National Literacy Trust is an independent charity and relies on voluntary contributions. If you have found our website useful, please consider making a donation. Every penny helps.
 




Copyright © National Literacy Trust 2008
Unless otherwise specified, all material on this website may be used for non-commercial purposes, on condition that the source is acknowledged. The NLT is not responsible for the content of external websites.
National Literacy Trust is a registered charity, no. 1116260 and a company limited by guarantee, no. 5836486. Registered in England and Wales.
Registered address: 68 South Lambeth Road, London SW8 1RL