NLT logo and link to NLT home page 
Literacy changes lives

Research on the REAL Project

About REAL


Outcomes for children and parents of an early literacy education parental involvement programme
Peter Hannon and Cathy Nutbrown, University of Sheffield (Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, 2001).

Background
The REAL Project is a Sheffield University/LEA/Schools partnership programme which has developed ways in which early literacy educators can collaborate with parents to improve the literacy outcomes for children. This paper reports on the preliminary outcomes for the programme, which consisted of home visits by teachers, provision of books and other resources, centre-based activities and a library visit.

All the schools were in city wards above the median on the government's index of multiple deprivation and five were in the most deprived 2% in the country. At each school eight children between three and three-and-a-half were chosen at random. All of the 88 families selected and invited to join the programme accepted, i.e. a 100% take-up. A control group was also identified.

Findings
Research showed that 72% of parents regularly participated in the programme and appeared to be engaged in literacy activities with their children in the home. (More often this was the mother but fathers' involvement was also apparent.) Parents mentioned specific benefits around literacy (e.g. a greater appreciation of books, recognition of rhymes) as well as school readiness, greater confidence and being able to relate to teachers. Children who participated in the programme were more likely to mention their parents when asked 'who they read with' and identified reading with home (despite the daily literacy hour). Teachers felt that home visiting was a positive feature of the programme.

Quantitative analysis showed that, at five years old, programme children were ahead on literacy measures despite the fact that the programme did not set out to teach children directly. By providing parents with ways of thinking about their roles to help them to help their children's literacy development, children's literacy levels did improve.


Preschool writing development and the role of parents
Anne Kirkpatrick, 2002. In C. Nutbrown (ed.) Research studies in early childhood education (pp. 97-114), Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.

Background
This small study, undertaken as part of the REAL project, looked at the home writing experiences of eight preschool children over an 18-month period. It aimed to discover whether there was evidence of their writing development, what kind of development occurred, how much variation in development there was within the sample and whether parental involvement had an impact.

The children were observed in their homes, writing and drawing samples were collected by their families and by the researcher, and they were assessed at the beginning and end of the project using the British Picture Vocabulary Scale (1) and the Sheffield Early Literacy Development Profile (2).

Findings
The study found that parental involvement strongly influenced the children's progress. Almost all of the parents were encouraging their children to write only by copying text from an adult's writing, book or other source, and some of the children were reluctant to write independently. The researcher held a writing development workshop in order to raise parents' awareness of the subject, and after this, more parents began to collect samples of their children's writing, including play-writing. However, as time went on parents once again began stressing the importance of correct letter-formation and copied words, which appeared to have a negative effect on some of the children's confidence: they feared 'getting it wrong' if they had nothing to copy from. Meanwhile, the two children who seemed more prepared to take risks were making good progress with their writing.

References:

(1) L. Dunn, C. Whetton and J. Burley (1997) The British Picture Vocabulary Scale - second edition, Slough: NFER-Nelson.
(2) C. Nutbrown (1997) Recognising Early Literacy Development: assessing children's achievements, London: Paul Chapman Publishing


Children's perspectives on family literacy: Methodological issues, findings and implications for practice
Cathy Nutbrown and Peter Hannon, University of Sheffield
Journal of Early Childhood Literacy. Vol 3 (2), August 2003, 115-145

Background to the study
This study demonstrates that young children can give their perspectives on family literacy, and that this could have implications for how family literacy programmes are developed. The researchers interviewed a group of 77 children who had been taking part in a family literacy programme based on the ORIM framework, and a control group of 71 who had not, about who they wrote, read and sang nursery rhymes with at home, their favourite books and rhymes, and where they saw words apart from in books. The children were in the reception class of schools in very deprived areas.

Methodological issues
The authors point out that most other research methods to understand children's learning have relied on observation, rather than listening to children and soliciting their views on matters of daily life and learning. It was decided to find out what the children said about literacy at home by having teachers and nursery nurses conduct short one-to-one interviews (around ten minutes) with them. The concerns of the interviewing team relating to interviewing young children were considered, and an appropriate approach was devised. This included ensuring that both parents and children gave their informed consent to the interview, that the children understood what was happening and that they were at no time uncomfortable or unhappy. A pilot was conducted, to which children responded positively; some of the team commented that the children seemed to enjoy the attention from someone who was interested in them.

Six questions, with prompts, were chosen for the full interview, focusing on four strands of literacy (reading, writing, nursery rhymes and environmental print). It was not expected that children would give an exhaustive list of everybody involved in literacy practices with them and what they did, but rather that it would be possible to infer from their responses which individuals and interactions were salient.

Findings
The study found that all of the children were involved in some literacy activity at home. The researchers suggest that this kind of literacy might not be as visible, or as valued by some educators, as the literacy that goes on in schools. The researchers also found that, according to the children, 39% of fathers were involved in reading with their children in the home, and 25% in writing; they call for more research into fathers' role in family literacy practice. Boys were also found to be active in literacy at home.

Participation in the family literacy programme was found to have an effect on children's perspectives of family literacy activities. Children in the programme group were slightly more likely than those in the control group to mention literacy involvement at home, and less likely to mention school literacy; they were also more likely to mention the kinds of literacy activities promoted by the programme. These include reading, writing and saying rhymes with various family members, naming a rhyme book or a non-fiction book and spotting print in the community and on clothes.

Implications
The researchers suggest three implications from this study for the future development of family literacy programmes:

  • Programmes should start from a position that they are building on families' existing knowledge and skills, and should extend the literacy activities that are already going on in the home
  • Programmes should be reviewed in order to maximise the involvement of fathers
  • There may be a need to review the content and delivery of programmes in order to maximise their benefits, perhaps focusing on particular strands of literacy and including flexible home visiting, group sessions and optional adult learning opportunities


References for other REAL publications

  • C. Nutbrown and P. Hannon (eds.) (1997) Early literacy education with parents: a professional development manual, Nottingham: NES-Arnold.

  • P. Hannon, C. Nutbrown and E. Fawcett (1997) Taking parent learning seriously. Adults Learning, no 3, pp. 19-21.

  • P. Hannon and C. Nutbrown (1997) Teachers' use of a conceptual framework for early literacy education with parents. Teacher Development, vol. 1 (3), pp. 405-420.

  • C. Nutbrown, P. Hannon and S. Collier (1996) Early Literacy Education with Parents : A Framework for Practice (Video), Sheffield: Sheffield University Television. ISBN 0-902831-34-8

Links:

   
You can help us change lives through literacy
 
 

The National Literacy Trust is an independent charity and relies on voluntary contributions. If you have found our website useful, please consider making a donation. Every penny helps.
 



Copyright © National Literacy Trust 2009
Unless otherwise specified, all material on this website may be used for non-commercial purposes, on condition that the source is acknowledged. The NLT is not responsible for the content of external websites.
National Literacy Trust is a registered charity, no. 1116260 and a company limited by guarantee, no. 5836486. Registered in England and Wales.
Registered address: 68 South Lambeth Road, London SW8 1RL