 |
|
Research on On Track
|
Also see...
More Government approaches
Related issues
|
On Track is a Government programme for preventative crime reduction,
aimed at developing multi-agency partnerships and delivering
a range of services to children aged four to 12 and their families.
The main categories of intervention are home visiting, pre-school
education, home-school partnerships, parenting support and training,
and family therapy.
As the children involved may have missed school and/or may
have problems with their literacy, these interventions provide
an opportunity to support them - and also their parents, both
by encouraging parents to see the importance for children
of books and reading, and by signposting them to basic skills
provision for themselves if they need it. This kind of programme
also provides opportunities for children and their parents
to discuss issues in their lives and to develop the language
skills needed to do so.
The programme was launched in 1999. By 2004 there were 24
local On Track partnerships in England and Wales, all located
in areas of high deprivation and crime. Agencies represented
in On Track partnerships include education, health, social
services, youth offending teams, the police and the voluntary
sector. A research report by Canterbury Christ Church University
College showed that On Track works predominantly in and through
schools, and accesses the community mainly through school-based
workers (1).
On Track was incorporated into the Children's
Fund. On Track services will therefore be considered for
inclusion in children's
trusts alongside Children's Fund services.
Links:
- For more information visit www.crimereduction.gov.uk
- The Department for Education and Skills (DfES) has produced
three thematic reports on On Track, which look at Partnership
Working, Assessment Referral and Hard-to-Reach Groups, and
Community and Schools Engagement. To download the research
briefs and full reports visit www.dfes.gov.uk/research
- The Home Office is also conducting an evaluation of On
Track; see below for summaries
Reference:
(1) On Track Thematic Report: Community
and Schools Engagement. Carl Parsons, Brian Austin,
Hazel Bryan, Jean Hailes and William Stow, DfES, 2003
Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate,
2004
This is an evaluation report based on evidence in the early
stages of On Track. It identifies the lessons learnt from
the project regarding setting up and managing large-scale
programmes of this kind. Some of its key findings are:
- There was some evidence that the behaviour of children
involved in On Track interventions had improved, though
caution needs to be taken in measuring impact at this early
stage of the programme.
- The majority of work has focused on developing services
for children. However, all projects have also developed
indirect work with parents.
- Projects had a variety of difficulties to overcome to
ensure delivery was achieved, including maintaining staffing
levels, managing difficulties with partners and securing
good quality accommodation.
- There was a lack of joined up thinking between those implementing
On Track nationally and agencies, managers and practitioners
delivering the programme locally.
Link:
For more details and to download the report in full visit
www.crimereduction.gov.uk/crimereductionprogramme31.htm
Hine, J. and Harrington, V. (2004). Delivering On Track.
London: Home Office.
National Foundation for Educational Research, Home Office
Development and Practice Report, 2004
On Track services should be available to all families who
might need them in the area covered by local partnerships.
However, practitioners became aware that some services were
not accessible to certain groups, or that some groups were
not coming forward to access them; meeting the needs of those
who were seen as 'hard to reach' therefore became a key challenge
for the programme.
This paper examines how service providers in a sample of
On Track areas define and consult 'hard-to-reach' families
and deliver services to them. It finds that definitions of
'hard to reach' varied between and within the agencies represented
in local partnerships, but broadly covered minority groups,
those 'slipping through the net' and the 'service resistant'.
The paper therefore recommends that practitioners should
ensure that any definition of 'hard to reach' groups should
be based on evidence, giving access to services for those
in greatest need, and that service providers should routinely
factor in the costs of consulting with marginalised groups.
Link:
For more details and to download the report in full visit
www.crimereduction.gov.uk/antisocialbehaviour33.htm
Doherty, P., Stott, A. and Kinder, K. (2004). Delivering
services to hard to reach children and their families in On
Track areas: definition, consultation and needs assessment.
London: Home Office.
|  |