 |
|
|
Also see:
Government approaches
|
Katerina Ananiadou, Andrew Jenkins and Alison Wolf, Institute
of Education, University of London, National Research and
Development Centre for adult literacy and numeracy, 2003
This paper summarises the evidence from the UK (and internationally
where possible) on the benefits employers derive from raising
the basic skills levels of the workforce. A number of large-scale
UK surveys have shown that people with good literacy and numeracy
skills tend to have higher wages and better chances of being
at work than people who lack basic skills. This suggests that
if you improve the basic skills among adults, their earnings
should increase but there is little direct evidence of this.
However, labour market studies indicate that very few jobs
could be performed without basic skills, and that skills requirements
will increase in the future.
There is some international evidence that employer-provided
literacy and numeracy courses may raise productivity, improve
the use of new technology in the workplace, contribute to
enhanced customer satisfaction, save time and reduce costs,
but the research base is very small. There is an absence of
UK data on rates of return to training of any kind, not just
basic skills training.
Those employers who have sponsored basic skills training
are generally positive about the experience and there is some
evidence that employers do not see it as either burdensome
or an unnecessary expense.
John Payne, Learning and Skills Development Agency, March
2003
This review, prepared in July 2002, pulls together existing
research on workplace basic skills and draws conclusions for
future policy, practice and research. While highlighting a
relative lack of interest in the area by academic researchers,
the review also uncovers evidence from successful good practice
of what works and what does not in workplace basic skills
which it says should not be ignored.
There are a number of factors which determine the effectiveness
of programmes, including working with the grain of the overall
political climate; conducting a learning needs analysis; considering
basic skills as a part of the firm's overall training and
development programme; provision which is free to the worker
and is offered in working time; clear visible support for
the programme from senior management; and evaluation linked
to the planning of ongoing learning opportunities. It is not
suggested that any single scheme would necessarily demonstrate
all these features: successful schemes succeed precisely because
they mould themselves to local circumstances.
Download the full report from: www.lsneducation.org.uk
York Consulting Limited, March 2002
The Fresh Start in the Workplace programme was developed
and managed by the Basic Skills Agency with funding from the
DfES Adult Basic Skills Strategy Unit. It comprised four areas
of activity: a brokerage scheme, training brokers and providers
to stimulate employer demand for adult basic skills provision;
a brokerage scheme in very small firms; work with national
training organisations (NTOs) to map basic skills standards
to national occupational standards; and support for human
resource managers to implement basic skills training in the
workplace.
The evaluation found positive feedback from the majority
of participants in the brokerage schemes and the NTO project
achieved its aims of mapping over 100 national occupational
standards against the basic skills curriculum. As NTOs are
replaced by sector skills councils there is a need to ensure
that the considerable momentum generated by the programme
is not lost, and the role that they can play in the delivery
of the Government's Skills for Life strategy is made clear
and promoted.
For more information call York Consulting on 0113 222 3545
or visit www.yorkconsulting.co.uk
Cabinet Office Performance and Innovation Unit, November 2001
This report to the Government recommends a radically different
strategy for improving the skills of the British workforce:
one that is driven by the skills demands of employers and
employees. A key priority are the 7 million adults with poor
basic skills. A higher standard of basic skills in the workforce
benefits not only individuals, in terms of career development
and increased pay, but also contributes to the country's economic
performance. The overall vision is to be able to develop,
by 2010, a society where Government, employers and individuals
actively engage in skills development to deliver sustainable
economic success. Current workforce skills development tends
to ignore those at the lower end of the skills spectrum. Poor
basic skills are a substantial barrier to taking up further
development opportunities so addressing this area of need
is a significant step towards meeting skills demands throughout
the workforce.
Policy Research Institute, Leeds Metropolitan University, November
2001, ISBN 1 84185 605 3
This report reviews the available evidence on the demand
for, and supply of, skills in England. In terms of basic skills,
the report focuses on demand for basic skills by UK employers
rather than the level of basic skills possessed by employees.
It concludes that although there is limited evidence on the
changing demand for basic skills, changes in the job market
have meant a reduction in the proportion of jobs held by people
with poor basic skills. In particular, the decline in the
number of people working in manual occupations has meant an
increase in the relative demand for people with at least a
minimum level of basic skills. Regardless of sectoral changes,
research has shown that 45% of employers feel literacy and
numeracy have increased in importance. However, evidence also
exists to suggest that the basic skills gaps within the current
workforce are less significant to employers than gaps in,
for example, IT skills. Other research indicates that many
employees make little or no use of reading and writing skills
in the workplace, suggesting that, in some areas or occupations
at least, people with relatively low basic skills may be able
to undertake jobs without difficulty.
Available free from DfES Publications on 0845 60 222 60 or
by visiting www.dfes.gov.uk/research,
reference SIE01. A summary document is also available, reference
SIE01S.
|
 |