NLT logo and link to NLT home page 
Literacy changes lives

Adults' attitudes to learning 

Also see:

Attracting new learners: international evidence and practice
Edited by Sue Taylor and Helen Cameron, Learning and Skills Development Agency, April 2002 

In relation to other countries, the UK's record on levels of qualifications in the workforce and participation in education after the age of 16 is weak. This report draws upon papers presented at an international seminar in July 2001 at which international participants considered how we can remove some of the barriers to learning that exist in the UK, particularly for those who have been out of touch with learning for a long time and those who in the past have benefited least from education and training.

The key recommendation was that action to promote demand for learning needs to be much more 'joined up', with stronger links being made between the social and cultural objectives and the learning and skills agenda, so that they reinforce each other. Local learning and skills councils, with their resources and scope for influence, should be at the heart of this joining up process. The value of informal learning should also be recognised, both in its own right and as a route to more formal, organised learning. With school success or failure being a key factor in the level of engagement in learning in later life, much more should be done to set all young people - not just those that follow an academic curriculum - on the path to learning, both in their working life and beyond.

Download the full report from the Learning and Skills Network: www.lsneducation.org.uk


Basic skills and social exclusion
Samantha Parsons and John Bynner, Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Institute of Education for the Basic Skills Agency, March 2002

Social exclusion is characterised by a lack of education, employment and community involvement, and failure to acquire basic skills such as literacy and numeracy can place a person at a distinct disadvantage in these areas. This publication quotes an earlier study, which used data from the British Cohort Study (of those born in 1970), to explore how reading levels early in life - combined with known risk factors such as social class, parents' education and overcrowded housing - relate to the level of social exclusion at age 16 and 30. It found that poor reading skills identified at age 10 are likely to increase the negative impact on the lives of those already at risk of social exclusion.

Apart from poor reading, the additional risk factors at age 10 include having parents with 'little' or 'unknown' levels of interest in their child's education and who were 'unsure' or 'did not want' their child to continue in education or training post 16. Having a low family income, a mother with no qualifications and an overcrowded home were additional risk factors.

By the age of 16, over half of boys with a high risk of social exclusion, and poor reading skills, thought school a waste of time and found homework 'boring'. Negative attitudes among girls were more likely to be associated with early reading scores. Poor readers also had lower aspirations and were most likely to think they would be 'working with their hands'.

Among men at age 30, high risk poor readers were least likely to be in full-time employment and more likely to be unemployed. They were also least likely to have been continuously employed since leaving school. Early social exclusion rather than poor reading appear to be the main obstacle to their employment opportunities. For women, poor reading was the main barrier to full-time employment, rather than early social exclusion. Poor readers of both genders were less likely to report having IT skills, any academic or vocational qualifications, or to have ever received work-related training. Differences were largely unrelated to social exclusion risk.

The report concludes that to address social exclusion it is clearly important to tackle the associated risk factors given above. There was evidence to suggest that reading can have a protective role, if the outcomes for high risk poor readers are compared with high risk good readers, although not in all cases.

See below "Basic skills and crime" for how to obtain this report.

Basic skills and crime
Samantha Parsons, Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Institute of Education for the Basic Skills Agency, March 2002

This basic skills and crime study used data from both the British Cohort Study and the National Childhood Development Study (of people born in 1948) to explore the relationship between poor basic skills and self-reported police contact and offending. It found that poor literacy scores in early life had a statistically significant relationship with the number of times men in both cohorts reported being stopped and questioned by police and arrested. Gender is the strongest risk factor of crime. Boys and men far outnumber girls and women in crime figures and the prison population: 94% of the current prison population is male (HM Prison Service, 2001). Other studies show that a wide range of measures of social disadvantage - including poverty, disrupted family environment, poor education experiences and early signs of emotional and behaviour problems - all have strong links with delinquent or criminal activity. Having poor literacy skills (men) and poor numeracy skills (women) directly increased the risk of offending.

See companion reports Basic Skills and Social Inclusion (above), Basic skills and political and community participation and Do I want to improve my reading, writing or maths?, based on the same longitudinal studies (also published March 2002). Contact Basic Skills Agency Publications on 0870 600 2400 or visit www.basic-skills.co.uk



Attitudes to adult education in disadvantaged areas
Joseph Rowntree Foundation, August 2000

Researchers interviewed 88 mostly white people aged 16 and over in an inner city in the north of England to explore their perceptions of a successful future. Below are some of their main findings

  • Some were sceptical of the role of education in helping them gain employment because of experiences of arbitrary employment practices and of jobs that do not require qualifications or training.
  • Negative experiences at school and other colleges and concern about academic competence were major concerns for interviewees of all ages.
  • Women with children who were accessing small supportive centres were not inclined to use different, 'more formal' provision. They felt positive about the confidence they had gained and the progress they had made and were loyal to the staff and peers that were supporting them. This made them disinclined to access different, more formal provision: "We have got to keep this centre going." (female aged 41-50).
From the conclusion
It would seem that a major issue is how to get members of socially excluded groups to take the first steps into education and training. Local and relatively informal educational settings, very close to highly localised communities, may be a way into education for some. Members of these groups require very substantial degrees of support, both financial and social, in order to succeed on courses which they take.

'Successful futures?' Community views on adult education and training by Helen Bowman, Tom Burden and John Konrad, published by York Publishing Services ISBN 1 902633 89 X,  £12.95
For a detailed summary visit the JRF website: www.jrf.org.uk/knowledge/findings/socialpolicy/810.asp



Getting better basic skills - what motivates adults
Basic Skills Agency, October 2000 Ref: A961

Twenty nine per cent of the 602 people interviewed for a Basic Skills Agency survey said they felt their reading, writing or mathematics needed improving. The survey, carried out by MORI, aimed to find out what why and how adults want to improve their basic skills.

When asked why they wanted to improve their skills, the most often mentioned reasons were: to feel better about yourself; to be able to perform basic skills in everyday tasks; to get a job; to perform better at work; and to help your children.

Of those prepared to do a course of some kind 41 per cent said they would prefer to learn at home, with 35 per cent choosing a local college. Fifty per cent of respondents preferred a teacher to assist them but 34 per cent said they would prefer a computer. Over half said they would consider a short test to gain a qualification an added bonus on joining a course. Learning on a computer would motivate them to improve their skills. 

The survey followed on from Fresh Start the Moser report on basic skills published in March 1999, which suggested a survey be completed looking at what basic skills learner have to say about what motivates them to learn.

Contact the BSA publications line on 0870 600 2400.



Adults 'too busy' to improve basic skills

Almost a third of adults think that they need to improve their mathematics, writing or reading but most are too busy to do so, according to a survey commissioned by the Basic Skills Agency and carried out by Mori.

Numeracy was the main concern of the 2000 adults polled with spelling next on the list of shortcomings. Fewer than one in 20 thought that their reading needed improving.

The Basic Skills Agency commissioned the survey to learn what needs to be done to intervene effectively. More than half of those in need of help said they could not spare the time to take a course but almost one in five blamed a lack of confidence. Almost all of those in need said they would be willing to give an hour a week to attend an educational programme. While more than half wanted a teacher as opposed to a computer programme to guide them, most would prefer to learn at home.

The agency said: "It is apparent that people want to learn on their own terms and that by recognising and accommodating this [we] can make progress in tackling the crisis in adult basic skills that this country faces."

(The Times, 31 October 2000)

Donate now

Bookshop

National Year of Reading logo

 

The National Literacy Trust is an independent charity and relies on voluntary contributions. If you have found our website useful, please consider making a donation. Every penny helps.
 



Copyright © National Literacy Trust 2008
Unless otherwise specified, all material on this website may be used for non-commercial purposes, on condition that the source is acknowledged. The NLT is not responsible for the content of external websites.
National Literacy Trust is a registered charity, no. 1116260 and a company limited by guarantee, no. 5836486. Registered in England and Wales.
Registered address: 68 South Lambeth Road, London SW8 1RL