NLT logo and link to NLT home page 
Literacy changes lives


Libraries and reading: Reports, reviews, etc.

Teenagers, reading and censorship: Teenagers' views on censorship in libraries

Based on a series of focus groups involving 88 young people, which involved speaking directly to young people about their understanding of, and attitudes towards, censorship to find out how they felt it affected them, this research suggested the following:

  • To help both teenagers and their parents, books for teenagers should include guidance on the cover about the incidence of sex, violence, drugs, swearing etc
  • Teenagers themselves should be involved in reviewing books and offering guidance on their suitability.
  • Librarians and booksellers should ensure they offer teenagers guidance, not unexplained restrictions.
  • Libraries for teenagers need to ensure that their stock contains a range of titles suitable for various combinations of emotional maturity and reading age.
  • More opportunities to read books dealing with controversial issues within the curriculum should be explored.
  • Efforts need to be made to involve parents in their teenager's reading, making them more aware of the content of books and better able to offer informed advice to their child.
  • Internet filtering in schools needs to be re-examined. It is currently extremely unhelpful and unsophisticated.
  • Rather than focusing on restricting access, it is imperative that teenagers are taught how to make informed choices about the information they gather from the Internetand the books they chose to read.

McNichol, S. (2006). Teenagers, reading and censorship: Teenagers' views on censorship in libraries. Birmingham: UCE.
Download the full report from: www.ebase.uce.ac.uk/docs/censorship-teenage-focus-groups-report.pdf


Libraries Impact Project

This study aims to enable the library sector to demonstrate its impact on areas covered by the shared priorities of central and local government. Seven library authorities contributed to the 2004 Libraries Impact Project, with the aim of establishing methodologies that can be taken up nationwide. The policy areas considered by the study are children, education (including adult education), health and older people. The methodologies are linked to wider frameworks such as Inspiring Learning for All and the five key outcomes of Every Child Matters.

The study found evidence of a clear and measurable contribution made by libraries to policy priorities at local and national level. The authors argue that this evidence forms part of the case for the continued involvement of libraries in these policy areas.

The report contains examples of surveys that can be undertaken with library users and ways that the data can be used to deliver more effective services, and makes a number of recommendations. These include:

  • The Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS), the Museums, Libraries and Archives council (MLA) and other key partners should consider developing a national template for impact measurement and a national approach to gathering survey information in the shared priority policy areas.
  • Longitudinal research should be undertaken to track in more detail the impact of libraries on each of the shared priority headings. In education, for example, such research could relate to the specific impact on pupil attainment at key stages for children attending summer reading schemes or study support through libraries.
  • The DCMS and MLA should undertake research to establish the reach and influence of library services and activities beyond the individual users and participants. This should seek to measure how individuals who use a library then transfer the learning that they gain to influence other individuals.
  • Government departments with responsibility for the shared priority areas covered by the project should agree with the DCMS and MLA a protocol through which libraries' contribution to these policy areas can be maximised and taken into account in the development of policy

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (2005). Laser Foundation: Libraries Impact Project. London: PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
Download the full report (pdf) from www.bl.uk/about/cooperation/pdf/laserfinal6.pdf


Developing reading communities: Linking secondary school reading clubs with public libraries through effective partnerships

This report summarises the results of The Reading Agency's part of the Developing Reading Communities programme, which ran in 2002-2003. This was part of a bigger programme funded by the Paul Hamlyn Foundation and run in partnership with ContinYou. The Reading Agency's strand of the work was called Building to Last and explored the potential of closer partnerships between schools and public libraries to encourage children to read for pleasure, and more widely. It consisted of a mapping exercise, a literature search and case studies in three areas of the country: Solihull, North Yorkshire and Slough. The main aim of the case study projects was to increase children's motivation and opportunity to read by building in the support and involvement of public libraries to work being done in school, especially through reading clubs. Building to last involved reading clubs in two schools run in partnership with the local public library (Solihull), a summer reading club for children (North Yorkshire) and a series of activities for young people around graphic novels (Slough). The projects were evaluated through surveys, questionnaires, observation, interviews and the collection of a variety of anecdotal evidence.

Mapping showed a rapid increase in the number of reading clubs in secondary schools in the past two years. The majority were run in the school library resource centre, usually by the LRC manager, often in conjunction with the English Department, and were targeted at Y7 students. Evidence showed these groups were having a positive impact on student's attitudes to reading and on attainment within school. There was also evidence of a developing range of public library service reader development work for children and young people. This work too was a having valuable effect, providing community support for children's reading, enabling access to a vast store of books at times when schools are closed, and stimulating children to read outside the confines of the school curriculum. The surveys confirmed that Schools Library Services (SLS) provide an extensive and effective network of support for work with readers in schools, although due to variations in different areas, this support is not available to all schools. Some barriers to joint working were identified, including funding restrictions, the short term nature of project funding, and the perceived restrictions of the secondary curriculum. A sound policy rationale emerged for improving links between libraries and schools, with an opportunity for everyone involved (including schools, public libraries, schools library services, and LEA advisory staff) to work more closely together to support children's reading within their communities.

Some of the main findings of this research are:

  • Partnerships between schools, public libraries and SLSs are valuable in supporting reader development work with young people.
  • The case studies also showed that reader development work is more likely to be successful where young people are involved in the planning of the activities and selection of stock.
  • The main threats and barriers to reader development partnership projects are: lack of understanding of the common ground between the partners, time and resources, competition with other activities, the challenge of complex and large partnerships, the danger of associating reading with school work, the challenge schools' complex catchment areas.
  • The case studies showed that School Library Services were key partners and facilitators, and were especially useful for ensuring effective communications with schools, providing advice and support for schools,
  • providing services for schools, including lending or selling books.
  • However, the effectiveness of SLSs is constrained by lack of core funding, lack of innovation funding to experiment with new services and variable provision nationally.

ContinYou (2004). Developing reading communities: Linking secondary school reading clubs with public libraries through effective partnerships. London: ContinYou.
Download the full report (pdf) from: www.continyou.org.uk/uploads/documents/doc_97.pdf


Reader development and reading promotion in school libraries and public libraries

Interest in reading declines beyond Key Stage 2. This means that there are clearly difficulties for both public and school librarians who wish to promote reading amongst eleven to sixteen year olds. Public and school libraries each have their own strengths. For example, public libraries are able to offer a wider variety of resources and a broader range of experiences, while an advantage of school libraries is that they are able to work with the same group of children and build on previous work.

Although finding time to work together can be a problem, it is likely that if they are able to work collaboratively, both school and public librarians will save time and effort in the long term. In addition to making the best use of expertise and staff, joint activities allow libraries to share costs and material resources, for example by making use of local or national publicity and promotional materials or joint funding of an author visit.

At present, much depends on the enthusiasm of individuals. While work on a local scale is clearly important, there is also value in more formal, organised approaches. There is likely to be a role for SLSs in co-ordinating local activity and for national bodies such as the CILIP and the Reading Agency in national initiatives. The most important issue, however, is the need for school and public librarians to develop a greater understanding of each other's roles and strengths. Activities such as joint training and meeting may go some way towards achieving this. Through working together, public and school librarians will be able to draw on expertise and resources and promote reading in a way which engages greater numbers of 11 to 16 year olds.

McNichol, S. & Buckingham, R. (2003). Reader development and reading promotion in school libraries and public libraries. Birmingham: UCE.
Download the full report from: www.ebase.uce.ac.uk/docs/Reader_development_report.doc


Impact of school library services on achievement and learning in primary schools

This literature review examines research that links educational attainment and school library use at the primary level and complements a review that examines the links between educational achievement and school library provision at the secondary level (which was completed at the end of 2001). The aim of this review was to examine the evidence from research conducted in the UK and abroad linking learning in its widest sense, encompassing processes and attitudes, with library provision, including the type of resources, nature of access and staffing. The evidence was then analysed in relations to: its applicability to primary school libraries and Schools Library Services in England; methodologies that could be used to assess the impact of library provision on learning; and any gaps in the research.

A body of research was identified that supported the view that primary school libraries can have a positive impact on academic achievement particularly when accompanied by appropriate action to ensure the service delivery is efficient and effective. However, much of this evidence was from countries where school librarians have a teaching qualification and more research is needed to determine the extent to which the evidence is transferable to England. There is limited research demonstrating the view that school libraries have the potential to impact on the broader aspects of learning, including vulnerable or special needs students.

Where there is evidence of impact on learning, there are associated key factors of collection levels, library staffing levels and collaboration between the librarian and teacher. Training of teachers and librarians is demonstrated to raise mutual understanding of each other's contribution and roles within the school library setting. Training should include information skills development, collection mapping, planning and evaluation.

There is no clear evidence to indicate the contribution made to learning by the various models of school library provision, although flexible scheduling appears to be an important factor in encouraging student use and to be effective this requires a full-time qualified librarian managing the resources. The presence of a librarian and the quality and frequency of their instructional input has an impact on learning but the relationship between this and qualifications and personal attributes and experience is less clear. School librarians who take a professional and proactive approach to their role within the school can cite evidence of their impact on teaching and learning; and are more able to reflect, self-evaluate and develop the service further.

Finally, this review makes several recommendations, including:

  • Research should be conducted to establish the extent of the existence of different models of library provision in primary schools
  • Research should be conducted into the impact of the different models of library provision on student learning
  • Research related to the National Literacy Strategy should be reviewed in relation to the use and management of library collections, selection of resources by teachers, and how such issues impact on learning
  • Consideration needs to be given to ensure pre-service training and professional development training of both teachers and librarians addresses the need for greater understanding of their professional contributions to learning in school libraries
  • Consideration should be given to identifying and piloting processes and outcome standards appropriate for use in primary school library provision.

Williams, D., Coles, L. & Wavell, C. (2002). Impact of school library services on achievement and learning in primary schools. London: Resource: The Council for Museums, Archives & Libraries.


Impact of school library services on achievement and learning

This critical literature review examines research linking educational attainment and school library use at secondary level. The study was funded by Resource: The Council for Museums, Archives and Libraries to inform the work of the DfES Task Group set up to implement actions contained in the Government's response to "Empowering the Learning Community". The work was conducted during the last three months of 2001.

The aims of the literature review were to examine evidence from research conducted in the UK and abroad linking learning, in its widest sense encompassing processes and attitudes, and library provision, including the type of resources, nature of access and staffing of provision. The evidence was then analysed in relation to its applicability to school libraries and Schools Library Services in England; methodologies that could be used to assess impact of library provision on learning; and any gaps in the research.

There was a body of research supporting the view that school libraries can have a positive impact on academic achievement, particularly at the primary and early secondary level and with appropriate action to ensure the service delivery is efficient and effective. However, much of this evidence was from countries where school librarians also have teaching training and more research would be needed to determine the extent to which the evidence is transferable. There is limited but significant research demonstrating the view that school libraries have the potential to impact on the broader aspects of learning, including vulnerable or special needs students. Where there is evidence of impact on learning, there are associated key factors of collection levels, library staffing levels and collaboration between the librarian and teacher. Training of teachers and librarians is demonstrated to raise mutual understanding of each other's contribution and roles within the school library setting and training should include information skills development, collection mapping, planning and evaluation. There is no clear evidence to indicate the contribution made to learning by the various models of school library provision, although flexible scheduling appears to be an important factor in encouraging student use. The presence of a librarian and the quality and frequency of their instructional input has an impact on learning but the relationship between this and qualifications and personal attributes and experience is less clear. However, school librarians who take a professional and proactive approach to their role within the school can cite evidence of their impact on teaching and learning; and are more able to reflect, self-evaluate and develop further.

The report recommends that:

  • Consideration is given to the pre-service and professional development training of both teachers and librarians in order to develop greater understanding of the respective professional contributions to learning in school libraries and to encourage reflection and increase the ability to provide evidence.
  • Funds are made available to sustain the quality of collections.
  • Consideration should be give to whether the emphasis in developing the links between the school library and learning are more appropriately begun with the primary sector.
  • A longitudinal approach, in association with appropriate interventions, is taken to examine the impact of school libraries on learning.

Williams, D., Wavell, C. & Coles, L. (2001). Impact of school library services on achievement and learning. London: MLA
Download this report from: www.mla.gov.uk

Donate now

Bookshop

National Year of Reading logo

 

The National Literacy Trust is an independent charity and relies on voluntary contributions. If you have found our website useful, please consider making a donation. Every penny helps.
 



Copyright © National Literacy Trust 2008
Unless otherwise specified, all material on this website may be used for non-commercial purposes, on condition that the source is acknowledged. The NLT is not responsible for the content of external websites.
National Literacy Trust is a registered charity, no. 1116260 and a company limited by guarantee, no. 5836486. Registered in England and Wales.
Registered address: 68 South Lambeth Road, London SW8 1RL