 |
| This article first appeared in the June 2001 issue
of Literacy Today
(issue no. 27). |
Professor Edward Melhuish, Birbeck College, University of
London, describes the Effective Provision of Pre-school Education
(EPPE) project, a study of children aged between three and seven
years.
The Effective Provision of Pre-school Education (EPPE) project,
funded by the Department for Education and Employment (DfEE),
is a substantial longitudinal study that assesses the progress
and development of children between the ages of three and
seven years. It investigates the contribution of individual
and family characteristics on children's attainment, as well
as the effect of different types of pre- school provision.
The EPPE project has already published several reports and
provided evidence to the Parliamentary Inquiry into Early
Years Education.
Early influences
The research indicated family and child characteristics, along
with the home environment, were powerful influences on children's
attainment at three to four years. Childcare experience had
more modest effects. Among the family influences, parental
education and higher socio- economic status were strong indicators
children's higher cognitive development on starting pre-school.
Children from larger families (three or more siblings) tended
to do less well on some measures.
Child characteristics were important. Girls tended to do better
than boys on social skills and cognitive measures. Where children
had previous developmental problems (e.g. slow to walk or
talk) or were premature or of low birthweight, they tended
to do less well on social skills or cognitive development.
Previous behavioural problems were also associated with poorer
social development.
The home environment was particularly important. Where children
experienced more learning activities with parents (e.g. reading,
painting/drawing, learning songs/rhymes, visiting the library,
playing with letters or numbers) they did better in social
and cognitive development. While more educated parents did
more of these activities, the association was modest, so that
some highly parents did little and some not-so-educated parents
did a lot. The results indicated the effects of home environment
were more powerful than those of socio-economic status or
parental education. What parents do is more important than
who parents are. There were also some modest effects of the
childcare a child experienced before three. We found no evidence
that the overall amount of childcare early in life was associated
with children's development, however there were some effects
with the type of childcare. Children with more experience
being cared for by relatives (usually the grandmother) were
rated as more cooperative and less antisocial --? whereas
children with more group childcare experience showed higher
cognitive scores but also were rated as showing antisocial
behaviour more often.
When children started primary school we were able to consider
what factors affected progress from three to five years of
age. The family background was still important. Children eligible
for free school meals did less well on cognitive measures.
Socio-economic status and parental education were continuing
to have an impact, and the home environment still showed powerful
effects over and above those seen on children's development
at three to four years of age.
Benefits of pre-school education
The study included a small group of children with very little
or no pre-school experience. Such children are very few these
days. These children differed markedly from the main part
of the sample on family background, but after allowing for
this, they were found to score lower on all cognitive measures.
This result strongly indicates the benefits of some pre-school
experience. However, the study could find no extra benefit
of full-time over half-time pre-school attendance.
In considering specific pre-school centres, it was clear
that some centres were having a distinctly better effect on
pre-school progress than others, especially on literacy- related
outcomes (e.g. pre-reading including phonological awareness).
These pre-school centre effects are still being investigated
as to the underlying characteristics associated with these
better settings. It is clear that some pre-schools provide
higher quality literacy and numeracy experiences than others
in the same. The full story of pre-school effects is still
unfolding and the outcomes will be reported at a later stage.
Research design
The EPPE project recruited 2,800 children selected randomly
from 141 participating pre-school centres (nursery schools/classes,
playgroups, private day nurseries local authority daycare
and combined centres) in five regions England. In order to
examine the impact of no pre-school provision, an additional
sample of 250 children without pre-school experience was recruited
from the Year 1 classes which EPPE children entered. In the
study both qualitative and quantitative methods are used.
Every child seen and assessed at three to four years on entering
pre-school and their parents were interviewed. Observations
were made at the pre-school and centre managers were interviewed.
The children were seen again in their primary school reception
class and will continue to be seen until the age of seven.
A parallel study is being carried out in Northern Ireland
(Effective Pre-school Provision in Northern lreland - EPPNI).
The data reported in this article relates to England. The
EPPE and EPPNI projects are the first large-scale British
studies on the effects of different kinds of Pre-school provision
relating experience in particular centres and type of centre
to child development.
For further details visit www.ioe.ac.uk/cdl/eppe.
Subscribe to Literacy Today
|  |