 |
| This article first appeared in the March 2005 issue
of Literacy Today
(issue no. 42). |
Family literacy is one way for parents to be involved
in their children's educational development; it is also a
key strand of the strategy to improve adults' skills. Viv
Bird outlines policy developments and new opportunities.
The influential role of parents in developing children's
language and early reading skills is widely recognised. Family
literacy programmes involve working with families to develop
their literacy practices and skills. Most aim to impart short-term
skills, but also long-term changes in families, relating,
for example, to support for children's school education, improvements
of adults' basic skills, employability and attitudes to lifelong
learning.
A paper by the National Literacy Trust and the University
of Sheffield, published earlier this year, provides an historical
perspective of family literacy development in England since
the 1980s. In reviewing the theory and research evidence,
it describes the climate for the current delivery of family
literacy. Several issues are explored: the nature of family,
the concept of literacy, how literacy inequalities in society
are understood, the kinds of teaching thought to be appropriate
for adults and children in programmes, and the aims of such
programmes.
In the 1990s, family literacy created links between two distinctive
strands of education: early childhood development and adult
literacy. Early development was seen in programmes such as
shared or paired reading, reading workshops and family reading
groups. Increasing concerns about literacy standards led to
a new approach, pioneered by the Adult Literacy and Basic
Skills Unit (ALBSU - now the Basic Skills Agency). This model,
imported from the United States and now known as the 'intensive'
family literacy programme (see below), consists of three components:
basic skills instruction for the parents, early literacy education
for young children, and joint parent-child activities. Evaluation
has shown there are benefits for parents and children.
Government funding for family literacy has increased substantially
in recent years, but it has often been short-term, which has
made it difficult to provide sustained literacy support for
parents with low confidence and skills. There have been concerns,
too, that the recent shift to a post-16 funding regime, the
Learning and Skills Council (LSC), has meant that family literacy
programmes are seen as a way of meeting basic skills targets
rather than supporting the needs of children or families.
As provision has expanded, there is a need for professional
development among early years and adult educators. For example,
early childhood educators are not trained or experienced in
working with adults and, therefore, in understanding the importance
of taking into consideration adults' previous, possibly negative,
learning experiences. Likewise, adult educators often need
to know more about pre-school development and the school curriculum.
Higher-level courses are being developed for adult basic skills
teachers, but there is still no obvious professional development
path for family literacy practitioners.
There is also a need for more research into basic issues;
for example, there is no clear evidence that combined family
literacy programmes are more beneficial than separate programmes
for adults and children. Also, there is a lack of longitudinal
studies to show the effect of family literacy programmes in
England, apart from the ALBSU studies referred to above.
There is evidence that family literacy programmes lead to
improved literacy for children, support parents in their parenting
role, encourage them to improve their own literacy skills
and go on to further training or employment. There seems to
be potential in pilot projects that combine family literacy
work with programmes that support healthy living, or help
parents deal with their children's anti-social behaviour.
These approaches would bring wider benefits to schools and
communities, contribute to school achievement and promote
community cohesion, both national priorities.
Family literacy is more likely to be successful when time
is allowed to engage parents in learning, through taster courses
and activities that are interesting and fun. Despite concerns
about the post-16 focus, there is more LSC money for family
literacy (known as FLLN courses - family literacy, language
and numeracy courses), including short courses as well as
the more intensive courses referred to earlier. There are
new models being piloted through Skills for Families, frontline
worker training for Sure Start staff through Step in to Learning,
and opportunities for library involvement building on the
Bookstart scheme. This is an exciting time for family literacy
work, but not without challenge.
If you're interested in developing a family literacy programme
find out if there is a family learning coordinator at your
local education authority or contact the basic skills/Skills
for Life coordinator at a local college.
|
Viv Bird is director of the Trust's Literacy and Social
Inclusion project. The 'Parents' section of the project
website includes family literacy research, policy and
practice. See www.literacytrust.org.uk/socialinclusion/parents.
The paper referred to, Family literacy in England:
theory, practice, research and policy, by Peter Hannon
and Viv Bird, appears in B.H. Wasik (ed.) (2004) Handbook
of Family Literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
A summary is on the Literacy and Social Inclusion website.
|
Subscribe to Literacy Today
|  |