NLT logo and link to NLT home page 
Literacy changes lives


ICT and computer issues: Research abstracts

Bishop, D., Adams, C., Lehtonen,A. & Rosen, S. (2005). Effectiveness of computerised spelling training in children with language impairments: A comparison of modified and unmodified speech input. Journal of Research in Reading, 28(2), 144-157.

This study evaluated a computerised program for training spelling in 8-to13-year-olds with receptive language impairments. The training program involved children typing words corresponding to pictured items whose names were spoken. If the child made an error or requested help, the program gave phonological and orthographic cues to build up the word's spelling. Eleven children received this training with ordinary speech, and eleven had the same program but with speech modified to lengthen and amplify dynamic portions of the signal. Nine children were in an untrained control group. Trained children completed between 6 and 29 training sessions each of 15 minutes, at a rate of 3 to 5 sessions per week, with an average of over 1000 trials. Children were assessed before and after training. Trained children learned an average of 1.4 novel spellings per session. The trend was for children presented with modified speech to do less well than those trained with ordinary speech, regardless of whether they had auditory temporal processing impairments. Trained groups did not differ from the untrained control group in terms of gains made on standardised tests of spelling or word and nonword reading. This study confirms the difficulty of training literacy skills in children with severe language impairments. Individual words may be learned, but more general knowledge of rule-based phonological skills is harder to acquire.

Abstract reproduced with permission of Blackwell Publishing: www.blackwell-synergy.com


Plowman, L. & Stephen, C. (2005). Children, play, and computers in pre-school education . British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 36 (2), 145-157.

The paper reports a study designed to inform the development of an information and communication technology strategy for the pre-school years of education. The main methods of collecting evidence were observations at seven pre-school settings and interviews with at least two practitioners and a number of children at each site. Practitioners generally referred to children "playing with the computer". We describe some of the problems to be found in the emphasis on free play in nurseries and play groups when this means children are using computers as complete novices. There were few examples of peer support; adults rarely intervened or offered guidance and the most common form of intervention was reactive supervision. Interaction with a computer was therefore a limited experience for most children, but we provide examples of guided interaction that suggest a way forward for professional development.

Abstract reproduced with permission of Blackwell Publishing: www.blackwellpublishing.co.uk


Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K. & Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, vol. 37 (2), 155-192.

This paper examines how secondary teachers of the core subjects of English, mathematics, and science have begun to integrate information and communication technology (ICT) into mainstream classroom practice in English schools. It draws on an analysis of 18 focus-group interviews with subject departments in these fields. Evident commitment to incorporating ICT was tempered by a cautious, critical approach, and by the influence of external constraints. Teacher accounts emphasized both the use of ICT to enhance and extend existing classroom practice, and change in terms of emerging forms of activity which complemented or modified practice. A gradual process of pedagogical evolution was apparent; teachers were developing and trialling new strategies specifically for mediating ICT-supported learning. In particular, these overcame the potentially obstructive role of some forms of ICT by focusing pupils' attention onto underlying learning objectives.

Abstract reproduced with permission of the Taylor and Francis Group: www.tandf.co.uk


Hoskins, S.L. & van Hooff, J.C. (2005). Motivation and ability: which students use online learning and what influence does it have on their achievement? . British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 36 (2), 177-192.

There has been much recent research examining online learning in universities, but two questions seem to have been largely overlooked in this context: (1) Which students voluntarily utilise web-based learning; and (2) Does this use influence their academic achievement? The current study aimed to determine whether the approaches to studying, ability, age, and gender of 110 undergraduates in the second year of a psychology degree predicted the extent to which they utilised online learning using Web Course Tools (WebCT) in support of a core Biological Psychology unit. Data were obtained from WebCT's student tracking system, Entwistle and Ramsden's 18-item Approaches to Studying Inventory (1983) and academic records. Multiple linear regressions and discriminant function analysis were used to examine whether individual differences predicted WebCT use, while analysis of covariance determined whether web use influenced academic achievement. The number of hits, length of access, and use of the bulletin board was predicted by age, with older students using WebCT more. These factors were also influenced by ability and achievement orientation. The degree of participation in self-assessment was not predicted by student variables, but, of those that repeated an online quiz, improvement was more likely in those with lower achievement orientation. Only bulletin board use influenced achievement, with those posting messages outperforming those not using, or passively using bulletin boards. However, because individual differences will determine the extent to which students utilise this facility, it is suggested that future research should focus on developing online learning environments that incorporate activities with both a beneficial influence on learning and appeal to a wide student population.

Abstract reproduced with permission of Blackwell Publishing: www.blackwellpublishing.co.uk


Brett, P. & Nagra, J. (2005). An investigation into students' use of a computer-based social learning space: lessons for facilitating collaborative approaches to learning . British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 36 (2), 281-292.

Provision of computers in universities for self-study is taken for granted and is seen as a "must have" educational resource, yet it is very expensive to fund. Students report that they use the Internet as their first stop in approaching research tasks. Learning theorists posit the important role of social interaction in contributing to learning. The use of collaborative methodologies such as group work also illustrate the importance, and perceived beneficial role of, learning with others. However, in general, student access to computers for self-study in UK Higher Education is provided through large rooms furnished with serried ranks of computers, which do not allow or encourage computer-based collaborative working. This study addresses this mismatch between approaches to learning and the way universities make computers available to learners. The University of Wolverhampton provides a social learning space with 24 computers on four fishbone-shaped tables, in a room without any restrictions on talking, eating, or drinking. It was provided so as to encourage learners to work collaboratively and to be able to integrate the use of a computer whilst doing so. This paper reports the initial findings of a study into its use, through questionnaires, observational data, and interviews. Has the provision of a computer-based collaborative learning space positively affected approaches to computer-based self-study? The results of this study inform how best Higher Education institutions might provide computer access to learners so as to encourage collaborative working and positively affect student approaches to their learning.

Abstract reproduced with permission of Blackwell Publishing: www.blackwellpublishing.co.uk


Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M. (2003). New technologies in early childhood literacy research: A review of research. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 3(1), 59-82.

Against the background of Michael KAmil and Sam Intrator's landmark reviews of research about new technologies and literacy development, this article maps recent research concerned specifically with the 0-8 years age group. Drawing on databases of research conducted in North America, Britain and Australasia, it affirms that the early childhood dimension is even more radically under-researched than other age ranges with respect to new technologies and literacy development. The authors develop an analytic framework comprising four quadrants to categorize the various studies conducted in the early childhood age range, and assign these to their appropriate quadrants. This reveals a lopsided distribution of the meagre corpus of studies available. The article provides a map of the field against which early childhood educators can judge 'at a glance' fow far their persoanl areas of interest are served by existing research. It simultaneously pinpoints areas where new research is needed to fill important gaps.

Abstract reproduced with permission of Sage Publications Ltd: www.sagepub.co.uk


 

 

 

Donate now

Bookshop

National Year of Reading logo

 

The National Literacy Trust is an independent charity and relies on voluntary contributions. If you have found our website useful, please consider making a donation. Every penny helps.
 



Copyright © National Literacy Trust 2008
Unless otherwise specified, all material on this website may be used for non-commercial purposes, on condition that the source is acknowledged. The NLT is not responsible for the content of external websites.
National Literacy Trust is a registered charity, no. 1116260 and a company limited by guarantee, no. 5836486. Registered in England and Wales.
Registered address: 68 South Lambeth Road, London SW8 1RL