 |
| This article first appeared
in the September 2000 issue of Literacy
Today (issue no. 24). |
The
Canadian challenge
Nancy
Watson, senior research associate, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education,
University of Toronto
| To
complement the HMI evaluation of the National Literacy and Numeracy
Strategies, the Department for Education and Employment (DfEE) commissioned
a team from the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the
University of Toronto (OISE/UT), specialising in the area of large-scale
educational reform, to undertake an independent external assessment
of the implementation. |
The National Literacy Strategy
and the National Numeracy Strategy are ambitious ventures intended to
raise standards in all primary schools in England; challenging targets
have been set and substantial resources allocated to the task. The Strategies
are highly comprehensive and well-developed. Putting good ideas into practice
is complex, particularly when the goal is not just to establish large-scale
change, but to sustain it.
Our team has developed a framework
that recognises the importance of both central mandates and local action.
It will guide our work over the next year or two as we follow the National
Literacy and Numeracy Strategies at the national level and also in primary
schools across the country.
In our first annual report for
the DfEE, we identified both strengths and challenges for the Strategies.
Noteworthy strengths include strong leadership, a high degree of policy
alignment and coherence, an appropriate balance of support and pressure,
adequate resources, and considerable responsiveness to feedback from the
field. The challenges relate to teacher skill and knowledge, as well as
the need to engage in constructive debate, drawing on the experience of
teachers and the findings of researchers. Embedding and sustaining change
over time depends on how such challenges are met.
The 1999 improvements in key
stage assessment results are likely due to the focused time on literacy
and numeracy in the classrooms. For continued improvement, educators need
ongoing access to high quality professional development and resources,
as well as opportunities for practice and discussion with their colleagues.
They also need to understand performance data and use such data to bolster
pupil learning. Regional directors have been appointed with specific responsibility
for initial teacher training to ensure those entering the profession are
equipped to teach literacy and numeracy.
The Strategies are off to an
impressive start, but if they are to be sustained, local educators must
continue to increase their understanding of literacy and mathematics and
must also feel a sense of ownership. Teachers with a good understanding
of the principles behind the Strategies, working together in supportive
professional communities, will be better able to alter their practice
to meet changing pupil learning needs. In schools and in the wider educational
community, including higher education, challenge and debate will help
to clarify ideas and ensure that the Strategies continue to develop.
Reference
For the full report, see
Earl, L., Fullan, M., Leithwood, K., & Watson, N. Watching
and learning: OISE/UT evaluation of implementation of the National
Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies
in Education, University of Toronto, 2000 available on the DfEE standards
site at The full report is available on the DfEE standards site at
www.standards.dfee.gov.uk
- this is a direct link to
the document. (If you have difficulty - go to the standards site,
then to publications within either literacy or numeracy)
Elmore, R. F. (1996),
"Getting to scale with good educational practice", Harvard Educational
Review, 66(1), 1-26
Fullan, M. (2000), "The
return of large-scale reform", Journal of Educational Change.
Leithwood, K., Jantzi,
D., & Mascall, B. (2000). Large-scale reform: What works,
Unpublished manuscript. Toronto: OISE, University of Toronto.
|
Subscribe
to Literacy Today
|  |