 |
| This article was referred
to in the March 2001 issue of Literacy
Today (issue no. 26) |
Elaine Cropper, literacy
coordinator, Myrtle Springs School, Sheffield
| Myrtle Springs School introduced the literacy hour to the secondary
classroom and developed literacy across the curriculum
while part of the 1998 key stage 3 national literacy project.
As a result, the school came off special measures, and
both behaviour and literacy standards improved. |
Myrtle Springs School was removed
from special measures in November 1999, with no serious weaknesses and in
February 2000, staff were filmed teaching the literacy hour for inclusion
in the key stage 3 training video, which is now being used in the local
education authorities piloting the English Framework.
In September 1998, the reading
ages of 201 Year 7 students were measured using the NFER Group Reading
Test. Only one student, a boy, recorded a high-order reading age of 15+.
85% had a reading age of 11 and below at the start of the year. By June
1999, having implemented a literacy hour and whole-school literacy approach,
this figure had been reduced to 59%. And 12 boys and 15 girls had a new
reading age of 15+. Altogether, 35% of the students who took both tests
improved their reading age, 24% by 2 years or more. Of the 60% of students,
who still had a reading age below their chronological age, 21% still managed
to improve their low score. A similar degree of progress has been evident
with students in 1999/2000.
Much had happened since the
start of the academic year 1998/9. Myrtle Springs School was still on
special measures when it was chosen to take part in the then key stage
3 pilot national literacy project. The city's schools were divided into
cohorts 1-3 determined by need - our school was part of Cohort 1. £8,000
of initial funding was made available to us to develop our literacy strategy,
alongside considerable support from Sheffield Advisory and Inspection
Service.
When the school was put on special
measures in 1997, Ofsted confirmed what the school had already identified,
which was the need to raise achievement through increasing levels of literacy
and numeracy and by improving the quality of teaching. There was a general
sense among staff that students were more capable than their written work
suggested, and that students' poor text knowledge was preventing them
from fully accessing the secondary curriculum. Both staff and students
were frustrated with the latter sometimes exhibiting challenging behaviour
in situations where their learning competence was being questioned.
Introducing the literacy
hour and whole-school literacy
I had observed the literacy hour
being taught, and I was given the opportunity to teach it myself to a
Year 5 and a Year 6 class in a local primary school. I talked at length
with teachers at my son's primary school fuelling my conviction that much
of the key stage 2 literacy hour could be effective at key stage 3. More
than that, I thought it was a model of good teaching which would go some
way to addressing the problems we had at Myrtle Springs School. Our new
headteacher and the senior team gave their unqualified support to the
school's drive to raise literacy standards and together we put a range
of strategies into action:
- The literacy hour was taught
to Year 7, every Friday morning, by a team of staff from the English
department who had been trained by the literacy coordinator.
- Staff agreed that all subjects
would include literacy skills in their schemes of work
- All staff were trained by
the literacy coordinator, senior manager, head of English and LEA literacy
consultant on 'literacy coaching' (text-attack skills), using writing
frames, and Directed Activities Related to Texts - DARTs
- Money was spent on high
quality texts, dictionaries and thesauruses for all English classrooms
- Wall displays were put in
classrooms to reflect teaching points e.g. key words, target language
Whole-school literacy
All staff agreed to implement
four procedures within lessons to promote literacy:
- To act as a "literacy coach"
- explicitly teaching text-attack skills and good reading behaviour
- To use writing frames to
help students scaffold their writing
- To improve standards of
oracy by encouraging students to answer oral questions in full sentences
- To end each lesson with
a 5 - 10 minute plenary, tied in with the learning objectives for the
lesson - "What have we learned today?"
The cumulative effect of staff
adopting literacy teaching techniques within their subject areas has been
significant. All departments reported that students were more able to tackle
texts, to speak confidently about their learning, to settle to writing tasks
more comfortably and to read more willingly. There is a common literacy
language between departments that did not previously exist. Our students
may not yet be better scientists or mathematicians, but they now have the
literacy skills to enable them to talk and write about what they do know.
The literacy hour
The weekly lesson is based on
the primary format of 30 minutes text investigation led by the teacher,
using either big books or enlarged texts. The teacher models the reading
of the text, followed by whole class choral reading. What follows is a
series of questions at text, word and sentence level, which is directed
by the teacher, and which ensures a high level of engagement from the
students. Twenty minutes guided reading runs alongside the rest of the
class working independently. Enhanced staffing at key stage 3 has enabled
paired teaching - although this has been limited to the least able and
most able classes. The final 10 minutes is a plenary session where teaching
points are revisited and the students share their work. The texts used
have included a wide range of poetry for example, Ian McMillan, Seamus
Heaney, weather poems, football poems - plus non-fiction texts such as
The Magic Bean, information Big Books, newspaper extracts, letters and
instructions.
Boys and the literacy hour
Boys burst to answer questions
in the fast and pacy 30 minutes' of oral work. The explicit nature of
the teaching, the consistent lesson format, the highly structured sections
of each lesson where there is a practical application of the skills covered
and the set amounts of time for each activity, all appeal to boys' learning
styles. We also feel that the lesson is more popular with boys because
less time is spent 'emoting' and empathising with the text and more time
is spent on deconstruction - how language communicates meaning. The 'closed'
writing activities such as language investigation using a dictionary and
thesaurus, finding examples of word classes, writing a specified number
of sentences, similes or metaphors, are all appealing because they offer
a definite outcome.
Teachers and the literacy
hour
High quality, structured materials
and lesson planning have encouraged and supported good teaching. Simultaneous
teaching of the same lesson to the same year group has encouraged discussion
of teaching methods and learning outcomes and partnership teaching within
the hour encourages professional debate and provides excellent INSET for
staff.
Monitoring
The Sheffield key stage 3 Literacy
Project is monitored by the Sheffield LEA through the Inspection and Advisory
Service, and by Professor Elaine Millard of Sheffield University. Internally,
Myrtle Springs has used a variety of methods. These include attitudinal
questionnaires for the students, self-evaluation by the teaching staff,
the headteacher's departmental review, literacy hour lesson observation
by the headteacher and senior team, partnership teaching with the literacy
coordinator and lesson observation by visitors from a variety of educational
establishments. Finally, through the process of termly inspections by
Ofsted, the effectiveness and success of the literacy project has been
confirmed.
The next steps
In common with our primary colleagues,
we have found that although reading standards have improved, the standard
of students' writing has not risen at the same rate. Our whole-school
focus this academic year (2000/2001) is to initiate procedures to improve
the standard of writing across both key stages. So far, this has included
adopting the English department marking system across the school, extending
the use and complexity of writing frames, explicitly teaching writing
genre in each subject area, teaching subject specific spellings and insisting
on a standard of presentation for all pupils' work.
To support the non-readers for
whom the literacy hour at primary school has not been a success, we have
seconded a Reading Recovery teacher, who has devised individual reading
courses, based on the Reading Recovery methods, for the small number of
students who enter Year 7 without functional literacy.
Click here
to subscribe to Literacy Today
|  |