| This article first appeared in the September 2003 issue of Literacy
Today (issue no. 36). |
Text messaging is often blamed for bad spelling, bad grammar, and a general
dumbing down of the English language. But a new project aims to use mobile
phones to teach basic literacy skills to young adults. Jill Attewell, m-learning
programme manager at the Learning and Skills Development Agency, explains
how.
During the recent MLEARN 2003 conference a delegate asked whether there
is a danger that using mobile phones in basic skills learning might be
counterproductive. He wondered whether the use of SMS (text messaging)
would result in poor spelling and grammar. At the conference -which brought
together educationalists, researchers and companies with a common interest
in mobile learning -this was not an unexpected question. I have been asked
similar questions many times in the three years during which we conceived
and started our mobile learning project - m-learning. The answer is dependent
upon context.
Some mainstream teachers have expressed similar concerns and there are
reports of examiners finding SMS abbreviations and slang in GCSE English
papers. This is worrying, although enquiries should perhaps focus on how
teachers have prepared their pupils for the examinations rather than on
the students' use of mobile phones. However, many young adults with poor
literacy are not taking part in traditional education, but they do have
mobile phones, which they use frequently and enthusiastically. We believe
that the desire to communicate in text is a vital early step towards literacy
and researchers have observed that young people who would not normally
write messages are often enthusiastic texters (Plant, 2001).
M-learning's target audience is young adults who have not succeeded
in traditional education, particularly those with literacy and numeracy
problems. It is a research and development project which started in 2001
and runs to September 2004. Our work includes research focusing on technologies
and interfaces, and users and uses of mobile phones, palmtops and computer
games. The research is coupled with development of learning materials
and experiences, accessed via mobile phones and palmtop computers, and
supporting learning management and intelligent tutor systems.
Very little of the existing research into mobile phone use includes any
effects on literacy. Kasesniemi and Rautiainen made a detailed studied
of SMS use by Finnish 13 to 18-year-olds. They reported that "Finnish
teachers have been worried about the negative effects that the free-form,
often quickly written text messages may have" particularly as "SMS communication
does not rely on traditional grammar or punctuation required for texts
written for school." However, they observed positive benefits especially
for boys who "have a tendency to resent official teaching of Finnish "
and because "the unique writing style provides opportunities for creativity."
Of course literacy is not just about spelling. Speaking, listening and
discussion are essential to improving reading and writing skills. Therefore
it is encouraging when a researcher writes that teenage girls interviewed
reported noticing that their male counterparts "had become far more chatty
and communicative since getting used to using mobile phones" (Plant, 2001).
Stephen Heppell, director of Ultralab at Anglia Polytechnic University,
emphasises the importance of the skill of oracy. He has observed that
"the ability to storytell, to speak in public, to show and tell, has historically
been valued as a mark of a literate citizen". Nowadays the mobile phone
offers young people unparalleled opportunities to speak in public and
storytell.
Some observers have expressed the concern that young people's social
and communication skills may be damaged by too much reliance on mobile
phones. However Taylor and Harper (2002) found young people often sat
together using their mobile phones and engaged in gift-giving rituals
by exchanging content or phones. Similarly, trials of our early prototype
learning materials found that the learners were very keen to communicate
with each other and to learn collaboratively. In our next phase of learner
research, in addition to trying out new materials and systems, we will
be exploring a variety of pedagogic approaches to mobile learning.
References
E. Kasesniemi and P. Rautiainen (2002) Mobile culture of children and
teenagers in Finland. In Katz and Aakhus (eds.) Perpetual Contact: Mobile
Communication, Private Talk and Public Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
A.S. Taylor and R. Harper (2002) Age-old practices in the 'new world':
a study of gift giving between teenage mobile phone users. Paper presented
at the Conference on Human Factors and Computing t Systems, CHI 2002,
Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. (20-25 April 2002).
S. Plant (2001) On the Mobile: The Effects of Mobile Telephones on Social
and Individual Life, Motorola.
|
The m-learning project is a pan-European research and development
project coordinated by the Learning and Skills Development Agency
and supported by the European Union's Information Society Technologies
programme. The other partners in the consortium are Cambridge Training
and Development (UK), Ultralab at Anglia Polytechnic University
(UK), the University of Salerno (Italy), and e-learning company
Lecando (Sweden).
More information about the m-learning project can be found at www.lsda.org.uk/programmes/mlearning.asp
Jill Attewell can be contacted at jattewell@lsda.org.uk
|
Subscribe to Literacy Today
|