 |
| This article first appeared
in the March 2000 issue of Literacy
Today (issue no. 22) |
Science
and whole-school literacy
Jane
Hough and Cathy Mitchinson, senior teachers, South Camden Community School,
London
| South
Camden Community School, London has discovered, like many others,
that when it comes to whole-school approaches to literacy it's not
so much a question of searching for the Holy Grail but more one of
identifying the good practice that already exists and spreading and
extending that expertise throughout all departments. |
How do you begin? This was the
question that initially plagued the literacy working party at South Camden
Community School. Initially there was a tendency to think we needed to
invent another wheel, that there was something out there that we should
be doing but weren't; everyone was waiting for answers. A literacy audit
had been of some value, identifying a number of useful areas to focus
on such as helping pupils understand that writing is different from speaking;
what the key points of a piece of text were; and how to take notes and
move to a finished piece of writing in the appropriate genre for the subject
area.
However, what was more important
was to concentrate on building best practice in the school. What we needed
to do was to make sure that we put into practice what we felt we already
knew, and to make clear to the pupils what we were doing and why we were
doing it. It sounds almost banal to say, but this very simple point helped
us to see a way forward.
What's in a name?
The working party began by agreeing
a definition of literacy and some principles that would underpin future
work. We agreed to incorporate other necessary skills into the policy
although the naming created quite a discussion - were we dealing with
study skills? key skills? what are learning skills? surely literacy is
part of a group of learning skills, so why mention it separately? is a
literacy policy the same as a language policy? We eventually agreed on
the umbrella title of Literacy and Learning Skills and believe the straightforward
way we have set out our intentions makes the policy clear.
We described the intended outcomes
of what pupils should know and the approaches to be used to reach them,
using a model gleaned from other schools and from The National Association
of Teachers of English (NATE). We also included the principles of accelerated
learning in lesson planning (this is a school policy). Each department
has a literacy file containing the policy and a variety of different articles
and support materials to help them in their practice. We intend to add
examples of successful practice from subject areas to the files to facilitate
the dissemination of best practice.
The science department
The department's first step was
to decide on what being literate meant in science. They arrived at this
definition:
"A literate science student
can make sense of phenomena they observe and interpret information from
a variety of sources. They are able to use correct scientific terminology
to communicate their conceptual understanding and are able to present
this in written, oral, pictorial and graphical forms. A literate science
student is able to carry out investigative work and present analyses and
evaluations of scientific data in appropriate forms."
Science teachers at the school
have worked closely with support staff over a long time to develop suitable
materials to stimulate active learning, oral work and support writing,
with a particular emphasis on meeting the needs of the school's many multi-lingual
learners. Much of this is now embedded in the way they teach and they
are apt to forget how much they have actually moved on. It became very
clear that, by concentrating on supporting bilingual pupils, class teaching
improved. This is because scientific concepts can be difficult and wordy
for many pupils, not just those who are bilingual. Teachers can help all
pupils access the language of science by explaining key words and allowing
time for discussion and oracy work before anything is written down.
Pupils are encouraged to read
books at home regularly and the department has its own science book loan
system thanks to the help provided by science technicians. This began
when the library system within the school was fragile and it has continued
simply because it works.
Writing in science using
scaffolding and modelling
1. At the end of a lesson
involving processes, homework is set involving a flow diagram of a
particular process (this could be blood circulation, Nitrogen cycle,
Haber process or generation of electricity).
2. At the start of the next
lesson the class is given a good example of a report written about
a completely different topic as a model. They are asked to identify
all the action verbs in one colour, and then to do the same with connectives
and to decide which are causal (reasoning) and which are temporal
(time-locked).
3. The next stage is paired
work where pupils use their flow diagram and suitable language prompts
to talk about the process under revision. They use the language ideas
from the model they have seen.
4. At this stage they can
be given a specific writing frame to help them to get a report onto
paper in an organised way. Some do not need the frame, but it should
be there for all to support the work and give them confidence. Starters,
action verbs and connectives are on the board. This could be done
in pairs but the process leads towards independent work as pupils
write their own reports more confidently. |
If you would like to discuss the
issues contact South Camden Community School on 020 7387 0126
Subscribe
to Literacy Today
|  |