|
NFER Reading Performance at Nine (1996)
The average reading ability of nine year olds has remained
much the same since 1948. Between 1987 and 1991 there was
a small decline in reading standards. But by 1995, standards
had returned to the 1987 level. The report compares the performance
in reading of 2,000 nine-year-olds in England and Wales with
pupils of the same age in 27 other countries. England and
Wales came 21st, towards the bottom of a middle group of countries.
They were well behind the top group, which included the United
States, Finland, Sweden, Italy and France, but were only just
below Germany, Canada and Hungary.
The NFER researchers found a 'long tail' of underachieving
pupils. Pupils tested in 1995 and 1996 made slower progress
between the ages of eight and nine than they did in 1987.
(The Independent 16 August 1996)
Standards of English and maths in primary schools have not
risen for half a century according to a CBI report of reading
and writing skills among 11 year olds.(From NFER survey).
Estimated cost to industry: £10 billion a year.
Concerns about boys' exam results might create the impression
that they have been lagging further behind girls. But the
gender gap between the two groups has remained stable over
the past decade as both boys and girls have seen their results
improve steadily. The Raising Boys' Achievement report highlights
the rising trajectory of achievement for both genders, noting
that this good news has been "relatively unrecognised
and uncelebrated by most commentators".
In English tests for 11-year-olds, for instance, the proportion
of boys getting a level 4 pass or better has gone up from
50% in 1996 to 72% in 2004. However, the same gender gap remains
because the rise has been matched by the girls . The proportion
of them passing increased from 65% to 83%. Boys and girls
of the same age have been closely matched in science and maths
with boys regularly outshining their female classmates.
The difference between the sexes' test scores becomes sharper
in secondary school. But the gap between boys' and girls'
GCSE results has also remained consistent over the past decade,
around 10%. Indeed, it can be argued that boys are steadily
catching up with girls at GCSE. This is because the percentage
point difference becomes less significant as both genders
do better. The gap between boys and girls was the same last
year as it was in 1995, at 10 percentage points. But because
both genders' passes have increased, the proportion of girls
to boys passing has shrunk. In 1995 a quarter more girls made
the grade, while in 2004 it was a fifth.
So should we be worried about boys' grades? If both groups
are doing better, does it matter so much that there's a gender
gap? The researchers behind the Raising Boys' Achievement
project say they are not "unduly concerned" if girls'
achievements continue to outshine boys' as no school would
want to make its female pupils perform worse. But they conclude
that the fact that only 80% of 11-year-old boys perform at
the same level as girls in writing tests shows that a stubborn
problem remains to be tackled.
The worrying performance of many black boys also gives reason
to be concerned. In 2004's GCSEs, only 27% of African-Caribbean
boys gained five or more A* to C grades, compared to 47% of
white boys. But 44% of African-Caribbean girls (and 61% of
black African girls) got the grades.
(TES, 17 June 2005)
Standards in English primary schools have never been higher.
All the evidence - national test results, international comparisons
and Ofsted reports - make this clear. In English 78% of 11-year-olds
reached the expected level for their age in the 2004 tests.
This represents an increase of 15 percentage points since
1997.
In the PIRLS international study published in 2003, England's
10-year-olds achieved the third highest scores in reading
literacy out of the 35 countries that took part. The TIMMS
study published in 2004 found that the mathematics performance
of England's 10-year-olds had increased more since 1995 than
any other country taking part in the survey.
During 2003/4, Ofsted inspectors found that around three-quarters
of primary teaching in English and mathematics was excellent
or good, whereas in 1997/8 just over half of teaching overall
was judged excellent or good.
(DfES press release, 3 June 2005)
|